Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15373 (RAJ)

PRADEEP @ CHINTU S/O LATE SHRI HARIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/734/2026 · 2026-01-29

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 734/2026 Pradeep @ Chintu S/o Late Shri Hariram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Keeron Ka Mohalla Ward No. 13 Police Thana Dooni District Tonk Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Faziya G. Khan for Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 29/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.270/2025 registered at Police Station Dooni, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2) and 109(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been implicated in this case merely because he is a friend of the co-accused-Virat. She further submits that the injury which is opined to be grievous in nature has not been attributed to [2026:RJ-JP:4159] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-734/2026] the present accused-petitioner. She also submits that the co- accused-Virat upon whom the grievous injury sustained by the complainant was attributed, has already been enlarged on bail. She also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.12.2025. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the injured has sustained grievous injuries with 13 stitches. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail and the grievous injury sustained by the complainant has not been attributed to the present accused- petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /105