Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15373 (HP)

SAHIL v. THE STATE OF HP

CWP/11598/2026 · 2026-07-14

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:28477 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.11598 of 2026 Decided on: 14.07.2026 Sahil … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: M/s Prem P. Chauhan, Shikha Rajta and Ayushi Sharma, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and in light of the fact that the petitioner has almost completed his tenure at the present place of posting, impugned transfer order is not being interfered with. 3. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made representation to the Authority and the Authority be directed to consider and decide the same sympathetically. Ordered accordingly. 4. Let representation filed by the petitioner be decided by the Authority within a period of six weeks from today. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 14, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?