Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010201122026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2757/2026 NOOR ALOM ALIAS NOOR ALOM MONDAL AND 4 ORS. S/O AZID MONDAL, R/O VILL SHIMULTAPU NO 3, PS GOSSAIGAON, DIST KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM 2: SAKAL SOREN S/O LT SONIRAM SOREN R/O VILL SRIRAMPUR PS GOSSAIGAON DIST KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 3: HABIJUL SK ALIAS HABIZUL SK S/O MONNAF ALI SK R/O VILL NO 3 SHIMULTAPU PS GOSSAIGAON DIST KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 4: JAHIDUL ISLAM S/O LATE JAMALUDDIN SK R/O VILL TENGNARBHITA PT I PS GOSSAIGAON DISTRICT KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 5: MASUD KHAN S/O KALIMUDDIN KHAN R/O VILL PALASHKANDI PS GOSSAIGAON DIST KOKRAJHAR ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A W AMAN, MD A RAHMAN,A MISHRA,MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 28.09.2026 1. Heard Mr. A. W. Aman, the learned counsel appearing for the accused applicants. Also heard Ms. A. Begum, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of BNSS 2023 praying for granting bail to the accused applicants in connection with Gossaigaon Police Station Case No. 206/2026 under Sections 112/308(6)/308(7)/317(4)/318(4)/319(2)/351(2)/351(3)/61(2)/3(5)/ 3(6)/3(8)/3(9) of BNS 2023. 3. The allegations in the FIR dated 05.09.2026 reveal that the accused applicants, along with some other unknown persons, have been operating around the Gossaigaon Police Station an organized group or gang, whereby they targeted vulnerable members of the public and falsely represent themselves as advocates, legal practitioners, or persons authorized or attached to the Police Department, and thereby deceived the people, claiming that they can procure Page No.# 3/4 registration, withdrawal, alteration, compromise, or transfer of criminal cases in exchange of money. 4. It is also alleged against the group that they have been indulged in preparing and filing false FIRs and thereafter, by threatening the victims with implications in serious offences, including offences under POCSO and NDPS, extort money from them for compromising or settling those cases from the so called victims. 5. On receipt of the FIR, police registered Gossaigaon Police Station Case No. 206/2026 under the aforementioned sections. 6. Mr. A.W. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the accused applicants submits that there has not been any specific allegation against the accused applicants and all the allegations in the FIR are vague and not substantive. He submits that a co-accused in the instant case has already been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. 7. In view of the aforesaid submissions, he submits that since the accused applicants are already behind the bars for 23 days, they should be enlarged on bail. 8. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, opposes the prayer of bail of the accused applicants. 9. The Case Diary in the instant case has been received and the same is perused. 10. On perusal of the CD, it is found that the accused applicants have been specifically named and implicated by several witnesses in the instant case. Page No.# 4/4 11. This Court has considered the submissions made by the counsel appearing for the respective parties. 12. It is also a fact that the gang, including the accused applicants, have been operating for quite some time involving many other persons, effecting the public at large. 13. Taking into account the kind of allegations made in the FIR as well as materials available in the case diary, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the accused applicants at this stage. 14. Accordingly, the instant bail application is rejected. JUDGE Comparing Assistant