Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15370 (CHH)

Mehattar Lal Sinha v. State of chhattisgarh

WPS/3488/2019 · 2026-01-12

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:1939 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3488 of 2019 Mehattar Lal Sinha S/o Ramji Lal Sinha Aged About 64 Years R/o Imlibhata Mahasamund, Ward No.2, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur Through Its Managing Director, Chaubay Colony, G.E. Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Branch Manager Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur, Chaubay Colony, G.E. Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Ms. Apoorva Pandey, Advocate on behalf For Respondents : Mr. Amit Buxy, Deputy GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 13.01.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of petitioner’s grievance i.e. grant of benefit of enhanced gratuity, he SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 may be permitted to file a comprehensive representation alongwith supportive documents before the concerned respondents authorities, which may be directed to be considered and decided within a reasonable time. 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file aforesaid representation alongwith copy of this order and supportive documents before the concerned respondents within 04 weeks’ from today and, in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to consider and decide petitioners’ said representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order preferably within 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation. 4. With aforesaid observation and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No cost. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if