PYDAH SUBRAHMANYA JAGANNADHA SATYA PRASAD v. NEMANI KRISHNA RAJASEKHAR
CRP/156/2023 · 2026-02-16
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15370 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15370 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010034782023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 156/2023 Between:
1. PYDAH SUBRAHMANYA JAGANNADHA SATYA PRASAD, S/O. LATE SRI RAMA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.3-16B-106, SHANTHINAGAR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. PYDAH RAMA KUMAR, S/O. LATE SRI SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.36-8-36, TILAK STREET, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. PYDAH VISWANADHA KUMAR, S/O. LATE SRI RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY, AGCD ABOUT 62 YEARS, HINDU, DOCTOR, R/O.
H.NO.1-14-15, SRI RAM NAGAR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. MAREMALLA RUPA, W/O. ASHOK KUMAR, D/O. LATE SRI RAMA KRISHNA MURTHY,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, RIO. H.NO.3/5, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR TOWN AND DISTRICT, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. NEMANI KRISHNA RAJASEKHAR, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA, AGED. 50 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. D.NO.61-2-23/29, KAKINADA. 2. VASAMSETTI SRINIVAS, S/O. VANAMAYYYA, HINDU, AGED. 49 YEARS, HINDU, D.NO.24-7-22/1, THAMMAVARI STREET, MANDAPETA. 2
3. MAVIREDDY MADHAVILATHA, W/O. SRINIVAS, HINDU, AGED. 41 YEARS, D.NO.16-6-2/1, VALLURIVARI STREET, MANDAPETA. 4. MAVIREDDY SRINIVAS, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED. 51 YEARS, D.NO.16-6-2/I, VALLURIVARI STREET, MANDAPETA. 5. MUTHYALA SEETHARAMBABU, S/O. VENKATARAO, AGED. 62 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. D.NO.31-07, JUNIOR COLLEGE ROAD, MANDAPETA. 6. KOVVURI VENKATA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED. 35 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. D.NO.2-152/B, MAIN ROAD, KONKUDURU, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, RAMACHANDRAPURAM JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE JURISDICTION. 7. RIMMALPUDI SAI SIVA, S/O. VENKATARAJU, HINDU, AGED. 32 YEARS, D.NO.6-108, PEDAPUDI VILLAGE, PEDAPUDI MANDAL. 8. NALLAMILLI PADMANABHA SATYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O.
SURYANARAYANA REDDY, HINDU, AGED. 50 YEARS, D.NO.1-40, PEDAPUDI VILLAGE, PEDAPUDI MANDAL. 9. SATHI SANKARA REDDY, S/O. VEERA RAGHAVA REDDY, AGED. 51 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.43-9-3/1, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL. 10. TADI SURREDDY REDDY SURREDDY, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, HINDU, AGED. 47 YEARS, D.NO.14-105, SOMESWARAM, RAYAVARAM MANDAL. AGED. 58 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. D.NO.3- 280, MAIN VEEDHI, NEAR RICE MILL, VENKATAKRISHNAPURAM, SAMALKOT MANDAL. 11. GOLLAPALLI GANGADHRA RAO, AGED. 58 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. D.NO.3-280,
MAIN VEEDHI, NEAR RICE MILL, VENKATAKRISHNAPURAM, SAMALKOT MANDAL. 12. PAMPANA VENKATA RAMARAO, S/O. SUBBARAO, HINDU, AGED. 41 YEARS, D.NO.8-41, PAMPANAVARI STREET, ARTHAMURU, ALAMURU MANDAL. 13. PEDDIREDDY RAVI KUMAR, S/O. SWAMY NAIDU, AGED. 41 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. D.NO.1-175, RAMALAYAM VEEDHI, SUNKARAPALEM, TALLAREVU MANDAL.
...RESPONDENT(S):
3
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the order dt.19.10.2022 in E.A No. 255 of 2022, in E.A No. 253 of 2022, in E.P No. 14 of 2022 in 0.S No. 8 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the IVth Additional District Judge, Kakinada, IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay on all further proceedings in E.A No. 255 of 2022, in E.A No. 253 of 2022, in E.P No. 14 of 2022 in 0.S No. 8 of 2007 on the file of IVth Additional District Judge Kakinada, pending disposal of the above CRP and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M L NEELIMA The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that a withdrawl memo has been filed and sought permission to withdraw the present Civil Revision Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 17th February, 2026 RKS