Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15367 (GAU)

NUR HUSSAIN MOLLAH v. J. B. EKKA AND 4 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/286/2024 · 2026-09-28

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010107352024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/286/2024 NUR HUSSAIN MOLLAH S/O- MEZER UDDIN MOLLAH, VILL.- MADAIKHALI, P.O. ASHARIKANDI, DIST.DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 784301. VERSUS J. B. EKKA AND 4 ORS. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:JAY SHIVANI THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JURIPAR, PANJABARI GUWAHATI-37. 3:GOKUL CHANDRA BROHMA THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DHUBRI ZILLA PARISHAD P.O. AND DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783101. 4:SMT. KEERTHI JALLI IAS, THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM, JURIPAR, PUNJABARI, GUWAHATI-37. 5:DR. B KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY IAS, ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM, MS A KHATUN Advocate for the Respondent : MR S DUTTA, A K GHOSE(R5),MR S DUTTA(R-3,5),MS. N BORAH(R-3,5),MR. K KONWAR(R-3,5),MS. N BORAH Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 29.09.2026 Heard Shri M. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri A. K. Ghosh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Shri Ghosh, the learned counsel has placed before this Court a recent order dated 23.09.2026 passed by the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Panchayat and Rural Development Department in compliance of the orders connected to the present proceeding. The order shows that the direction of this Court has been considered and necessary orders for release of pension has also been passed w.e.f. the date of regularisation of the service of the petitioner i.e. 10.06.2003. In the considered opinion of this Court, the aspect of wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court in question will not arise. The contempt petition is accordingly closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant