HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33115 of 2023 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. It is argued by Shri Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners that due to subsequent development the present writ petition has become infructuous. 2. This prayer has not been opposed by the counsel for the respondents. 3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 6, 2026 Swati Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, C.S.C., Udai Bhanu Singh (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Mahendra Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad