1 907.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 907 SECOND APPEAL NO. 529 OF 1992 GANPATRAO YASHWANTRAO DESHMUKH ANDOTHERS. VERSUS PURUSHOTTAM SHRINIWAS JOSHI. ... Advocate for Appellants : Mrs S. S. Choudhary. Advocate for Respondent No. 1-1-a : Mr. Anand D. Kawre. ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5604 OF 1998 IN SA/529/1992 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2728 OF 2007 IN SA/529/1992 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4577 OF 1992 IN SA/529/1992 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11628 OF 2026 IN SA/529/1992 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 1995 IN SA/529/1992 ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 06th October, 2026. P.C.: CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11628 OF 2026 1 This application is filed for bringing the legal representatives of deceased applicant / appellant No.1(a) on record. 2 Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the application. 2 907.odt 3 For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Permission is granted to bring the legal representatives of applicant / appellant No.1(a) on record with directions to the learned counsel for the appellants to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the legal representatives. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today. Civil Application No. 11628 of 2026 stands disposed of. 4 It is made clear that if the amendment is not carried out within the stipulated period, then the appellants will require to deposit costs of Rs.4000/- with the Advocates Chambers Allottees Maintenance Co- operative Society, High Court Premises, Aurangabad. SECOND APPEAL NO. 529 OF 1992 5 This appeal has completed 34 years and it has to be argued at any costs on the next date. 6 List the second appeal on 16th October, 2026, first in 10:30 am category. 7 It is clarified that if the appeal is not argued and any Advocate seeks an adjournment on the next date, this Court would impose heavy costs on the party seeking such adjournment. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga