1 APHC010032312024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 1870/2024 Between: 1. MALLIPEDDI BHARATH KUMAR, S/O SIVA PRASAD, AGE 32 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, HONEY HOMES. FLAT NO 104, NEAR ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, PORANKI ROAD, NIDAMANURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE AND EMPOWERMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT A.P 2. PROTECTION OFFICER D V ACT FAC, DIST WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE AND EMPOWERMENT OFFICER,,KANURU, VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT 3. MALLIPEDDI NANNURI KOMALI, W/O BHARAT KUMAR, D.NO 43- 143-20, SMART E WORLD BUILDING, PAIPUL ROAD, AJITH SINGH NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No 2 in issuing RC.No.283/DVC/2023, containing false statement, as arbitrary, illegal, and 2 violative of Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and suspend the operation of RC.No.283/DVC/2023, issued by the Respondent No 2 and consequential proceedings in DVC No 137 of 2023 on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate court, Vijayawada in the interest of justice, pending disposal of this writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. REGULAGADDA VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.1870 of 2024 This Court made the following ORDER: Though the matter is posted today under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. The docket order shows that there was no representation for the petitioner on 19.06.2024 and 29.01.2026. 2. Hence, it appears that learned counsel for the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the writ petition. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J DT: 05.02.2026 krk 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.1870 of 2024 DT: 05.02.2026 krk 38