18nob3936-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3936 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1488 OF 2025 Shriniwas Nanabhau Nagargoje And others Versus The State of Maharashtra and others … Mr. Fulchand R. Tandale, Advocate for the Applicants Mr. D. J. Patil, APP for the State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 28th September, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Not on Board. Taken on Board. 2. Heard learned Advocate for the applicants. 3. The present application is filed for restoration of the original proceedings, wherein the applicants were directed to carry out amendment within a specified time. Though the amendment has been carried out out, according to the learned Advocate, the office objects by stating that the amendment is carried out beyond the prescribed time granted by this Court and dismissed the matter for non prosecution. 4. The learned Advocate submits that the time granted by this court should have been extended. However, taking into consideration the statement made by the learned Advocate for he applicants that the 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:45896 18nob3936-26 amendment is now carried out, though belatedly, the said statement be verified by the Registry, whether the amendment has been carried out as directed. If the amendment is carried out successfully, then the matter be restored, to be heard on merits. 5. After the said process is complete, the learned Advocate is at liberty to mention the matter for circulation. 6. The Criminal application stands disposed of in the above terms. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 2 of 2