Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15360 (AP)

Gorre Prameela v. Gorre Chaitanya Sri

CRLRC/64/2020 · 2026-01-20

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010029592020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 64/2020 Between: 1. GORRE PRAMEELA, W/O.GORRE BENARJI BABU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O.AKUNURU VILLAGE, VUYYURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GORRE CHAITANYA SRI, D/O. GORRE BENARJI BABU, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS 2. GONE NAVANEETH BABU, S/O. GONE BENARJI BABU. AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS. (RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 BEING MINORS REP.BY THEIR FATHER GONE BENARJI BABU, S/O.GORRE SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O.KUNDERU VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.) 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to Criminal Revision in this Hon'ble Court aggrieved by the Decree and Order dated 03-12-2019 in F.C.O.P.(M.C.) No.144 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Principal Family cum IV Additional District judge at Vijayawada, krishna District. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SULTANA SHAIK 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 3. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This instant Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, aggrieved by the Order dated 03.12.2019 passed in FCOP No.144 of 2018 by the learned Judge, Principal Family Court-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Vijayawada. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that during the pendency of the matter, respondent No.1 who is the daughter of the Petitioner got married and respondent No.2 who is the son of the Petitioner attained majority in the year 2022 and that no further orders are necessary in this matter. Recorded. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed. Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 21.01.2026 Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Criminal Revision Case No. 64 of 2020 21.01.2026 Mjl/*