JAHANGIR HUSSAIN v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONERTO GOVT PWD R AND B DEPTT AND ORS
WP(C)/1805/2026 · 2026-06-15
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1536 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1536 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1805/2026 CM No. 3983/2026
Jahangir Hussain …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. Tariq Mughal, Advocate Vs
UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Palvi Sharma, Assisting Counsel vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 15.06.2026
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after some arguments, has submitted that he would be satisfied if respondents are directed to treat the present petition as representation and accord consideration to the same within a stipulated time frame. His statement is taken on record. Having regard to the limited and innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition is allowed with a direction to the respondents to treat this petition as a representation and accord consideration to the same in accordance with law expeditiously, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures is made available.
Disposed of as above.
(Rajesh Sekhri) Judge
Jammu 15.06.2026 Pawan Angotra
Sr. No.76
Pawan Angotra 2026.06.15 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document