Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010210282026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2929/2026 SHRI CHITRA RANJAN BORAH ALIAS JUMON ALIAS RAKESH, S/O LATE MONURANJAN BORAH, R/O MELENG SUDAMUA GAON, P.O. HAOKH, P.S. AND DISTRICT JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785101. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. S R A NASER, MR S AHMED,S K SARFRAJ KARIM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 28.09.2026 Heard Mr. S. R. A. Naser, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. K. Das, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. By this application the petitioner has sought for bail in connection with Teok P.S. No. 100/2026, registered under Sections 3(5), 316(2), 318(4), 351(2), 61(2) of the BNS, 2023. Page No.# 2/3 3. The FIR in connection with which, the petitioner was arrested on 31.08.2026, was lodged by one, Abhijit Tanti, of Meleng Tea Estate stating inter alia that, the petitioner along with others had taken cars by adopting illegal ways and that the cars could not be traced till today. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner had bought the car from the one, Rohan Tanti and although, he had given a consideration for the said vehicle but he could not get the possession of the same. As such, he submits that he is not involved in the said offence. 5. Mr. K. K. Das, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State, however, submits that, the Case Diary be called for to see the entire gamut of the case and he says that the two numbers of vehicles were not recovered. 6. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsels, more so in view of the fact that, the petitioner has been arrested in the month of August, 2026, and there being many contradictory facts, this court deems it fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with one local surety of the like amount of the satisfaction of the CJM, Jorhat under the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall positively appear before the Investigating Officer as and when call for. (ii) The petitioner shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case, and/or influence the witness connected with the case; and Page No.# 3/3 (iii) The petitioner shall not leave their residence without prior permission of the Investigating Officer. 7. The Bail Applications stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant