RAJINDER KUMAR ALIAS RAJU v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/8290/2026 · 2026-03-13
Surya Partap Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15357 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15357 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-829
IN T 128
RAJINDE
STATE OF
CORAM:
Present:
SURYA P
like to pre contained i
2.
the cause ti issued to th provisions registering earlier num under the 8290-2026(O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ CHANDIGA
INDER KUMAR @RAJU
VERSUS TE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUR
Ms. Rishma Verma, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy YA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitio to press the present petition with ined in the petition.
The abovementioned prayer re
“the present petition may kin se title of the present petition and n to the respondent No.2 to 4 to follo ions of Bharatiya Nagarik Su ring/after registration of any case number of false FIRs have been the Punjab Excise Act without any
1
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT DIGARH
CRM-M-8290-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 13.03.2026
.....PETITIONE RSUS
.....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH vocate puty Advocate General, Punjab. petitioner has submitted that she wou with regard to prayer No.1 only, a ayer reads as under:- kindly be accepted as prayed for nd necessary directions may kindly b follow/comply with all the mandato Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 befo case/FIR against the petitioner, a een registered against the petition any evidence against the petitione
&M) .2026
IONER DENTS e would nly, as for in dly be datory before er, as itioner tioner, VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.16 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-829
without an audiograph
3.
Counsel ha complied w
4.
Counsel, th No.1 and f
Vinod 8290-2026(O&M)
t any recovery from the petitione raphy;”
With regard to abovementio sel has assured that the abovementi lied with by the respondent No.2.
In view of abovementioned a sel, the present petition is hereby par and for rest of the prayer the same is
2
ioner, without any videography an mentioned prayer, the learned Sta mentioned statutory provision will b oned assurance given by learned Sta by partly allowed with regard to pray me is hereby dismissed.
y and d State will be ed State o prayer VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.16 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document