RAJENDRA TIWARI AND ANOTHER v. DEEPAK KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS
CAPL/6421/2026 · 2026-10-08
Piyush Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15354 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15354 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6421 of 2026 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. In pursuance of the earlier order passed by this Court, Shri Dhyan Shanker Pandey, learned counsel for opposite parties, has obtained instruction, which is taken on record. Placing reliance upon the aforesaid instruction, learned counsel for opposite parties submits that the order passed by the writ Court has been duly complied with in its letter and spirit.
Learned counsel for the applicant(s) does not dispute the aforesaid position and submits that he has no grievance with regard to compliance of the order. In view of the aforesaid admitted position, nothing further survives for
consideration in the present contempt proceedings. Consequently, no cause of action survives. Accordingly, the contempt application stands disposed of. The contempt application shall be consigned to the records. The notice, if any, stands discharged. However, liberty is granted to the applicant(s) to approach this Court by moving an appropriate application, in the event of non-compliance of the
order by the opposite party(s) within a period of one month from today. October 9, 2026 A.N. Mishra
Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mukesh Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dhyan Shanker Pandey (Piyush Agrawal,J.) Rajendra Tiwari And Another .....Applicant(s) Deepak Kumar And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad