CRM-M-26716 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 121 SAKANDER LAL UNION OF INDIA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to criminal complaint dated 04.04.2026. 2. petitioner before the respondent No. respondent No. stipulated time. 3. 26716-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH SAKANDER LAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Ajaypal Singh Sandhu, Advocate Dr. Anju Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.1 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No.3. PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.3 and 4 criminal complaint dated 04.04.2026. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the r had filed the representation dated before the respondent No.4. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.4 to decide the representation of the petitioner stipulated time. Notice of motion. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26716-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. Anju Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.1 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No.3. as been filed by the petitioner 3 and 4 to pass a speaking order in a sel representing the petitioner submits that the dated 04.04.2026 (Annexure P- earned counsel prays for directions to representation of the petitioner within (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for pass a speaking order in a sel representing the petitioner submits that the -11) earned counsel prays for directions to the within the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.12 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26716 the respondent No.1 5. upon the State 6. behalf of the respondent No.3/CBI. 7. hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. representation of the within a period of order. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of letter of the petitioner Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 26716-2026 (O&M) 8587 Dr. Anju Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab upon the State is hereby dispensed with. Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.3/CBI. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Dr. Anju Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab Hence service of notice Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate has put in appearance on Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4 to decide the (Annexure P-11) by passing a speaking order from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, representation. The respondent No. shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents , and take an independent decision at his own level. :Yes/No : Yes/No Dr. Anju Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of Hence service of notice Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate has put in appearance on writ petition is to decide the by passing a speaking order from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, . The respondent No.4 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents , and take an independent decision at his own level. GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.12 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document