Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4523] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 83/2026 Ashok Son Of Khyaliram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Adhira (Chhind), Police Station Harsora, District Kotputli- Behror. (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar) ----Appellant Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through The PP. ----Non-appellant
2. Jairam Son Of Battu Ram, Resident Of Adhera, Harsora, Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan, India. ----Complainant/Non-petitioner For Appellant(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor Mr. Vivek Gaur for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 31/01/2026
1. This criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on behalf of the appellant being aggrieved with the order dated 06.12.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial Court’) in Bail Application No.462/2025 (CIS No.402/2025), whereby the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant in connection with FIR No.206/2025 registered at Police Station Harsora, District Kotputli-Behror for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 303(2) & 119(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act was rejected.
[2026:RJ-JP:4523] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-83/2026]
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the accused- appellant is in custody since 03.11.2025 and the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge- sheet in the matter.
3. It is also submitted by counsel for the appellant that in the alleged incident two persons from the complainant side have sustained injuries and there is only one grievous injury which is on the finger of left hand. It is submitted the accused-appellant is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the complainant submits that there are specific allegations against the present accused-appellant of inflicting injury to the complainant party and therefore, he does not deserve to be released on bail.
5. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the complainant.
6. As per contents of the FIR, the accused-appellant is said to have made attack on the complainant with a lathi and demanded some money for liquor.
7. On perusal of the medical report of injured persons, there is only one grievous injury sustained by the complainant party.
8. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also the allegations and the injuries sustained by the complainant party, this Court without expressing any opinion
[2026:RJ-JP:4523] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-83/2026] of the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to allow this appeal filed by the accused-appellant.
9. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 06.12.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar is set aside. It is directed that the accused-appellant named above shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.206/2025 registered at Police Station Harsora, District Kotputli- Behror, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /4