SHIV PRATAP SINGH @ NIKKI BANNA S/O SHRI LAKHANRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/558/2026 · 2026-01-15
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15340 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15340 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1603] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 558/2026 Shiv Pratap Singh @ Nikki Banna S/o Shri Lakhanraj Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Simarda, Police Thana Sapotra, District Karauli, At Present House No. 08, Mahaveer Nagar, Balaji Vihar 16, Vatika Road, Police Thana Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur South. (The Accused Presently In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 15/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.806/2025 registered at Police Station Muhana, Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 140(3), 115(2), 126(2), 309(4) and 308(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the contents of the FIR.
4. The accused-petitioner has not named in the FIR. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is of cooperating the co- accused, namely, Suraj in committing the offence.
[2026:RJ-JP:1603] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-558/2026]
5. The contents of the FIR are also not very much clear as what the complainant wants to say. The contents of the FIR creates confusion as regards the prosecution story.
6. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /212