Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15340 (AP)

M/s. Coastal Green Belt Developers v. Sri. M.V.Satyanarayana

CC/2296/2013 · 2026-03-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010032622013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2296/2013 Between: 1. M/S. COASTAL GREEN BELT DEVELOPERS,, FLAT.NO.203, RAMANA RESIDENCY, KIRLAMPUDI LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM - 017, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI. GODAVARTHI VEERABHADRA RAO, S/O. SRI. G. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI M V SATYANARAYANA, Commissioner, The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation. GVMC Building, Asilmetta, Visakhapatnam. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the Respondent and punish under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act violating the order dated 17.09.2013 in W.P.No.24926 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(APPL 1225 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent to forthwith release the amounts of Rs.90,97,181/- payable to the Petitioner Firm in respect of works executed 2 pursuant to the Individual Agreements in the interests of justice and equity, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Mr. Sri Harsha, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this Contempt Case has become infructuous since the main Writ Petition itself had been dismissed as withdrawn vide Order dated 31.03.2016. 2. Having so recorded, this Contempt Case disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 31.03.2026 MNR 4 167 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2296 OF 2013 Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr