KALPANA VITTHAL DHERE DIED THR LRS SANGRAM VITTHAL DHERE v. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI VITARAN VIBHAG KOLAWADI
CA/8248/2026 · 2026-07-31
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1534 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1534 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 965-ca-8244-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8244 OF 2026 IN FAST/6019/2024 VITTHAL GOVIND DHERE VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI VITARAN VIBHAG KOLAWADI ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8247 OF 2026 IN FAST/6016/2024 TUKARAM GOVIND DHERE AND ANR. VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI VITARAN VIBHAG KOLAWADI AND ORS. … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8248 OF 2026 IN FAST/6013/2024 KALPANA VITTHAL DHERE DIED THR LRS SANGRAM VITTHAL DHERE VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI VITARAN VIBHAG KOLAWADI … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8251 OF 2026 IN FAST/5843/2024 TUKARAM TATYA RAUT DECEASED AND SAKHARBAI TUKARAM RAUT DECEASED AND LRS BAPU TUKARAM RAUT AND ORS VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8274 OF 2026 IN FAST/5839/2024 PRABHAVATI SHANKAR BHAPKAR DECEASED THROUGH LRS JAYWANT SHANKAR BHAPKAR VERSUS 2026:BHC-AUG:32451
(2) 965-ca-8244-2026.odt THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.22103 OF 2026 IN FAST/5850/2024 SITABAI DNYANEDEO RAUT VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA … Mr. Madhav K. Jadhav h/f Mr. Abhijit S. More AND Mr. S. D. Bhagwat, Advocates for Applicant in respective Civil Applications. Mr. R. K. Ingole, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. A. S. Shelke, Advocate for Respondent No.1. … CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : 31st JULY, 2026. P.C.:-
1. Heard learned Advocates appearing for respective parties.
2. By these applications, applicants seek permission to withdraw amount deposited by Acquiring Body in pursuance to direction given by this Court while granting stay to Award.
3. The learned Advocate appearing for applicants submits that this Court granted ad-interim stay to Award subject to condition that Acquiring Body deposits 50% of compensation amount as assessed by Reference Court. However, Acquiring Body has deposited only 13% of total compensation amount.
4. Even taking into account grounds of Appeal, this Court finds that there is no impediment in permitting applicants to withdraw
(3) 965-ca-8244-2026.odt 13% amount, which has been deposited by Acquiring Body without imposing any condition.
5. Hence, Civil Applications stand allowed.
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/July-2026