HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40923 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and learned counsel for the contesting respondent are present. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to file a fresh petition. 3. Learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for the contesting respondents have no objection in case the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 8, 2026 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Vinayam, Narendra Mohan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Darshan Gupta (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Sayeed Ahamad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad