1 2026:CGHC:1915-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 118 of 2025 1 - Sanjay Mandhania S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad Mandhania Aged About 51 Years R/o 9th Floor Ashford Center Opposite Peninsula Corporate Park Lower Parel (West) Mumbai (Maharashtra) 2 - Harshvardhan Dugar S/o Shri Kanakmal Dugar Aged About 55 Years R/o 9th Floor Ashford Center Opposite Peninsula Corporate Park Lower Parel (West ) Mumbai (Maharashtra ) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Station Sipat Bilaspur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Dinesh Singh S/o Late H.N. Singh Aged About 62 Years R/o M- 01 Yadunandan Nagar Tifra Sirgitti Bilaspur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.2. : Mr. Harsh Dave, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13/01/2026 1. Heard Mr. Kshitij Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.01.14 10:43:17 +0530 2 Shaleen Singh Bahgel, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the Respondent/State, Mr. Harsh Dave, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ/direction/order respondent authorities to produce entire records pertaining to the instant case; 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/direction/order of appropriate nature. quashing the impugned FIR No. No.0086/2025, Dated 06.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered at P.S. Sipat, District Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offences punishable under Sections 420 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; 10.3 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/direction/order of appropriate nature set- quash the impugned notice Dt. 15.02.2025 (Annexure P-13) Colly, since the same is illegal in the obtaining factual matrix and unsustainable under the law;. 10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/direction/order, quashing any consequential action/proceeding pursuant to the impugned FIR. 10.5 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s) as it may deem fit." 3 3. The learned State counsel has submitted that in the present case after due investigation closure report has been filed. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is accordingly disposed of with the liberty to private respondent No.2, is aggrieved by the said closure report he may take recourse to law. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok