Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010208402026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2943/2026 SUSHIL BASAK S/O. LATE PHATIK BASAK, R/O. B.G. COLONY, PRAGJYOTISHPUR, P.S. JALUKBARI, GUWAHATI DISTRICT KAMRUP M, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S DAS, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 30.09.2026 Heard Mr. S Das, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. RJ Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jalukbari PS Case No. 348/2026 registered under Sections 305 of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested on 12.09.2026 Page No.# 2/3 was lodged by one Yasin Ali on 09.09.2026 stating inter alia that when he parked his bike in front of the Jalukbari Traffic Police Branch, his bike was stolen there from. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that during investigation of the said case, the petitioner was arrested on the ground that he had allowed the recovered motorcycle to be kept in his cycle store. He submits that the petitioner has no connection whatsoever with stealing of the said motorcycle. 4. Mr. RJ Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, on the other hand submits that the forwarding report reflects that the petitioner had given permission for keeping the stolen bike in his store and had prayed for calling of the Case Diary. 5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, more so, in view of the fact that it is stated in the forwarding report that the petitioner had allowed one of his employee to keep the motorcycle on being apprised that he had purchase the same, in his cycle store does not show his complicity and as such, the petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Kamrup(M) under the following conditions: i) the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for. ii) the petitioner will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case. iii) the petitioner will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the permission of the concerned Court. Page No.# 3/3 6. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant