HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4526 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent authority, to decide the Case No. T.B. 217, Computer Appeal No. 202054054400000564 (Ramjeet and others vs. State of U.P.), pending before him, within the time frame fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that application is pending consideration since long and the purpose of filing the present petition would stand served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the aforesaid case. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid proposition. 5. Considering the totality of the circumstances and submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would stand sub served if directions are issued for expeditious disposal of case. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent authority, to decide the Case No. T.B. 217, Computer Appeal No. 202054054400000564 (Ramjeet and others vs. State of U.P.), on merits, strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramjeet And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of service of certified copy of the order of this Court. October 8, 2026 v.k. updh. WRIB No. 4526 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad