On 09.04.2026, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel submits that no overt act has been attributed to the petitioner though he was alleged to be part of unlawful assembly. He is an dispute inter se the neighbors. He is ready and willing to the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. BS Sar Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 16.04.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required , this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel submits that no overt act has been petitioner though he was alleged to be part nlawful assembly. He is an employee of MCD and dispute inter se the neighbors. He is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating At the asking of the Court, Mr. BS Saroha, DAG, notice on behalf of respondent-State. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the before 16.04.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction Officer, subject to compliance of conditions enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.23 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 23.04.2026.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from PSI Parveen affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 09.04.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.23 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.