HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 7588 of 2024 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Sri Mohd Amish, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that no cause of action survives to maintain the instant writ petition, inasmuch as the grievance of the writ petitioner has been redressed by the authority concerned; therefore, the instant writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 2. Learned Standing counsel has no objection to the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. As such, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2026 Suraj Srivastav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd Aamir, Mohd Amish Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Suresh Singh, Vimlesh Kumar Rai (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Daanish Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad