RAJESH CHOUDHARY SON OF SHRI RAM DHAN JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/278/2026 · 2026-01-28
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15326 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15326 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3962] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 278/2026
1. Rajesh Choudhary Son Of Shri Ram Dhan Jat, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Vidhayakpuri, Jaipur City South, Jaipur, At Present Resident Of Lasadiya, Phagi, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Buddhram Jat Son Of Shri Ramkaran Jat, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Vidhayakpuri, Jaipur City South, Jaipur, At Present Resident Of Kaririya, District Tonk (Raj.).
3. Om Prakash Meena Son Of Shri Haraji Lal Meena, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Vidhayakpuri, Jaipur City South, Jaipur, At Present Resident Of Village Choundiawas, Lalsot, Chondiawas, Dausa (Raj.). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent
2. Sandeep Bachchani Son Of Shri Ashok Hachchani, Resident Of A-70A, Asha Deep King Court Vila, Jirota, Sanganer, Shivdaspura, Jaipur City South (Raj.) ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Rajawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP and Ms. Ananya Gupta, Adv., on behalf of Mr. Anirudh Singh, Adv., for complainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 28/01/2026
1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.261/2025 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence punishable under Section 308(2) of BNS, 2023, on the basis of compromise.
[2026:RJ-JP:3962] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-278/2026]
2. Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.
4.
Learned counsel for complainant submits that complainant has no objection if the present misc. petition is allowed.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.261/2025 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN MEENA/S-395