Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010206902026 2026:GAU-AS:14493 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2882/2026 BIJOY SABDAKAR AND ANR SON OF JITENDRA SABDAKAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- INATHPUR, P.O. AMBARKHANA, P.S. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM-788712 2: SUMAN SUKLABAIDYA SON OF SUKUMAR SUKLABAIDYA RESIDENT OF UMAPATI BETAIL VILLAGE- AMBARKHANA P.S. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSAM- 78871 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S DAS, P J DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 29.09.2026 Heard Mr. S. Das, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3 2. By this application, the petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Sribhumi Police Station Case No. 214/2026, registered under Section 191(2), 190, 296, 121(2), 109 as well as 351(2) of BNS, 2023. 3. The FIR in connection with which the petitioners were arrested on 07.09.2026, was lodged by the police personnel, stating inter alia that, while he was doing his duty, at around 10:00 PM on 03.09.2026, the petitioners had parked their vehicles and a motorcycle in an in-appropriate manner over the bridge and by consuming alcohol were creating ruckus in the area which has also resulted in heavy traffic jams. He further stated that, when he told the petitioners along with others, who were present therein, to remove their vehicles and to leave the place, the petitioners along with others had attacked him and threatened him with dire consequences. It is also stated that, they assaulted him with the keys of the vehicles by keeping it within the figures and on sustaining injures when he shouted other police personnel came and rescued him and took him to the hospital. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, there was a quarrel amongst the parties, but there was no intention on the part of the petitioners to assault the victim, i.e. the informant. He also submits that the petitioners were inside the jail for quite some time and they be released on bail. 5. Mr. B. Sarma, the learned APP, for the State of Assam, on perusal of the case diary submits that there are statements of the witnesses saying that the petitioners were involved in assaulting the informant in a very cruel manner. 6. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsels, Page No.# 3/3 more so in view of the fact, that the petitioners had not only ignored the directions of the police officer but also had attacked the police officer, resulting in injuries, this Court at this stage, does not deem it fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. The Bail Application is dismissed and disposed of at this stage. JUDGE Comparing Assistant