ORLANDO FERNANDES SON OF SHRI AUGUSTIN FERNANDES v. ALIMUDDIN SON OF SHRI BASRUDDIN
CRES/39/2026 · 2026-01-30
Bipin Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15319 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15319 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4498] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 39/2026 Orlando Fernandes Son Of Shri Augustin Fernandes, Resident Of House No. 517/28, Goa Colony, Bhajanganj, Ajmer, Presently Resident Of Shivshakti Nagar, Dholabhata Gaon Road, Dholab- hata, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Alimuddin Son Of Shri Basruddin, Resident Of 5/116, An- darkot Ajmer.
2. Shyam Sunder Tapadia Son Of Shri Kanhaiyalal Tapadia, Resident Of A-24, Chandravardai Nagar, Ajmer.
3. Heeranand Son Of Shri Mahadev Mal Mlakani, Resident Of 17/91, Nala Bazar, Ajmer (Since Deceased).
4. Jasbinder Singh Son Of Shri Rajindar Singh, Resident A- 660, Chandravardari Nagar, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kartik Sharma on behalf of Mr. Alok Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 30/01/2026
1. The present Civil Restoration Application has been filed as- sailing the order dated 10.12.2025, whereby the writ petition was dismissed for non-compliance of the order that 08.10.2025 passed by this Court for curing the defect(s) pointed out by the Registry.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that he could not cure the defect(s) as the reasons for not curing the de- fect(s) were beyond his control.
3. Considered.
[2026:RJ-JP:4498] (2 of 2) [CRES-39/2026]
4. This Court deems it appropriate to restore the writ petition to its original number subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- with Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jaipur.
5. It is made clear that if the receipt of the said amount is sub- mitted and all the defect(s) as pointed out by the Registry in the writ petition are cured within a period of two weeks, then the orig- inal writ petition be listed for admission.
6. If the same is not done, then this order will not come into ef- fect.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the present Civil Restoration Application stands disposed of.
8. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J JUBIN/41