SMT. LALI DEVI W/O SHRI RATAN JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/3/2026 · 2026-01-27
Chandra Prakash Shrimali, Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15318 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15318 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3591-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ (Habeas Corpus) Petition No. 3/2026
1. Smt. Lali Devi W/o Shri Ratan Jat, R/o Village Avania, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur Rajasthan.
2. Narendra Singh S/o Shri Manaram Jat, R/o Mothiya Ki Dhani, Newta Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur
3. Commissioner Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur ( Raj.)
4. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur District. Jaipur
5. S.H.O. Police Station Sez, Jaipur (West,), Jaipur
6. Jeetu Choudhary S/o Shri Ratan Lal Choudhary, R/o Village Kishanpura, Kala Ki Dhani, Tehsil Mauzmabad, District Jaipur. (Rajasthan).
7. Smt. Tulsi D/o Shri Ratan Lal Choudhary W/o Shri Vinod Choudhary, R/o Village Kishanpura, Kala Ki Dhani, Tehsil Mauzmabad, District Jaipur. (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhaker, DGC with Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Madan Gopal, ASI, Ms. Manbhar, MFC 3043, P.S. Sej, District Jaipur (West) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Judgment / Order 27/01/2026 Pursuant to order of this Court dated 22.01.2026, Shri Madan Gopal, Assistant Sub-Inspector and Ms. Manbhar, MFC
[2026:RJ-JP:3591-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-3/2026] (3043), Police Station Sej, District Jaipur (West) have produced the missing girl-Ms. “R” before us. Indisputably, she is major. On interaction, she submitted that she is not in illegal detention and is residing at Jaipur out of her free will. She stated that she does not want to go with the petitioners and wants to reside on her own. In view of the aforesaid, this habeas corpus petition is
disposed of in following terms:-
1. Ms. “R” is not found to be under illegal detention.
2. Being major, she is at liberty to go wherever she wishes.
3. The police authorities are directed to escort her fromwhere she has been brought. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-1