Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15317 (DEL)

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1 v. VRINDA FARMS PVT. LTD.

ITA/532/2026 · 2026-08-11

Dinesh Mehta, Rajneesh Kumar Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010297082026 + ITA 532/2026 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta and Mr. Anant Mann JSCs. versus VRINDA FARMS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anupinder Jassal and Mr. Ujwal Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R % 11.08.2026 1. By way of present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1961’), the Revenue has challenged the order dated 28.11.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 4694/Del/2024 for Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as ‘AY’) 2012-13. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent at the outset argued that the impugned notice is beyond the time period prescribed under Section 149 read with Section 153A of the Act of 1961, as prevailing at the relevant time (AY 2012-13). 3. He submitted that the issue involved in the present writ petition is This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:21:56 squarely covered by judgments of this Court rendered in the case of Pr. CIT (Central-1) v. Ojjus Medicare (P.) Ltd., [2024] 161 taxmann.com 160 (Delhi)/[2024] 465 ITR 101 (Delhi). 4. Mr. Anant Mann, learned Junior Standing Counsel for the appellant/Department could not dispute the aforesaid position of facts involved. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Needless to mention that since the impugned notice under Section 148A of the Act of 1961 was issued on 31.03.2023, the relevant AY is 2023-24. Therefore, the notice impugned issued qua AY 2012-13 is clearly beyond the period of 10 years, if calculated backward from AY 2023-24. 7. The appeal is dismissed, accordingly. DINESH MEHTA, J. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J. AUGUST 11, 2026/nd This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:21:56