MAJARUDDIN ANSARI @ MAJRUDDIN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4732/2026 · 2026-05-29
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15313 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15313 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:15836 ) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4732 of 2026 Majaruddin Ansari @ Majruddin Ansari
... Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
---
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P.
---
Order No. 02
Dated 29th May, 2026
1. Heard Mr. Rahul Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.
2. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026.
3. The petitioner and others were apprehended by the police and Mobile and SIM Cards were recovered. They are suspected to be involved in cyber crime.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no victim has come forward to lodge any complaint. Learned counsel adds that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and he is custody since 15.04.2026.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Regard being had to the above, the petitioner above named is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum- Special Judge Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026, subject to the condition that one of the bailer should be the close relative of the petitioner.
7. This application stands allowed.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
Dated: 29.05.2026 Rashmi/- Uploaded: 01.06.2026