Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15313 (GAU)

SRI PRABHAT PATHAK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS

WP(C)/3155/2026 · 2026-09-29

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010118022026 2026:GAU-AS:14535 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3155/2026 SRI PRABHAT PATHAK S/O-LATE HALADHAR PATHAK, R/O-FLAT NO.PK, RISCON ENCLAVE, SAWKUCHI, P.O-SAWKUCHI, DISTRICT-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. 2: SRI SUDIPTA SARKAR S/O-LATE SUBODH SARKER R/O-DREAMLAND APARTMENT BARSAPARA GUWAHATI P.O-BINOVANAGAR DISTRICT-KAMRUPM ASSAM. 3: SRI PURNENDU BIJOY LASKAR S/O-LATE BINOD CHANDRA LASKAR R/O-1A MAYURI RESIDENCY PRAGATI NAGAR SATGAON P.O-UDAYAN VIHAR DISTRICT-KAMRUPM ASSAM 4: SRI BIDYUT BARUN SARMAH S/O-DANDADHAR SARMAH R/O-VIRAT ENCLAVE GANESH MANDIR ROAD BYE LANE NO.11 NEW GUWAHATI NOONMATI P.O-NOONMATI DISTRICT-KAMRUPM ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 5: SRI KUSHAL DUTTA S/O- LATE GHANASYAM DUTTA R/O-DIBANG RESIDENCY PENSIONPARA PATH CHANDMATI P.O-SILPUKHURI DISTRICT-KAMRUPM ASSAM 6: SRI PANKAJ KUMAR BORTHAKUR S/O-LATE DEBEN BORTHAKUR R/O-MOUPIA APARTMENT HOUSE NO.76 GANESH MANDIR ROAD P.O-NOONMATI DISTRICT-KAMRUPM ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, LABOUR WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN-781006. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP M DISTRICT ASSAM. 3:THE BAKIJAI OFFICER OFFICE OF THE G DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP M DISTRICT HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-781006 ASSAM 4:THE MANAGEMENT THE ASSAM TRIBUNE PRIVATE LTD. ASSAM TRIBUNE GROUP MRD ROAD CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-781003. 5:ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER GUWAHATI SHRAM BHAWAN ULUBARI GUWAHATI-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U S BORA, MS. P BORAH,MR S BORTHAKUR, SR. ADV. Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. A SANDILYA(R4) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 30.09.2026 Ms. P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Ms. S. Baruah, learned State Counsel, is present. In view of above, writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant