APHC010031762013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 4364/2013 Between: 1. B. SRINIVASA RAO, S/O PENTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: NIL (EX FIELD ASSISTANT OF AJJARAM GRAM PANCHAYATR/O AJJARAM VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, NREGS, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 2. PROJECT DIRECTOR, DWMA & APDC, NREGS, ANDHRA PRADESH, SRIKAKULAM 3. MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/, PROGRAMME OFFICER, NREGS MANDAL PRAJA PARISHADETCHERLA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings in Lr. No. 573/2010/E2/G.N.V. dt. 26.8.2011 issued by the 2nd respondent as well as the proceedings of the 1st respondent dt. 5.3.2012 made in Lr. No. 573/2010/E/GNV as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice, violative of Circular No. 4553/NREGS-AP/2008 dt. 2.7.2008 and apart 2 from being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and consequently suspend the said order pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 5437 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith reinstate the petitioner into service by suspending the proceedings in Lr. No. 573/20101E21G.N.V. dt. 26.8.2011 issued by the 2nd respondent as well as the proceedings of the 1st respondent dt. 5.3.2012 made in Lr. No. 573/2010/E/GNV, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M VISWANADHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The petitioner has challenged the order of termination passed by the 2nd respondent. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner was engaged as Field Assistant on a contract basis for a limited period of time. It is submitted that the appeal preferred by the petitioner was also dismissed by the 1st respondent and that the petitioner was not in the service of the respondents after completion of the contract period and that, as on date, another employee is working on contract basis. 3. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 12.03.2026 PNS