Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15311 (RAJ)

NEERAJ KUMAR SWAMI S/O NARESH KUMAR SWAMI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/515/2026 · 2026-01-15

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1588] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 515/2026 Neeraj Kumar Swami S/o Naresh Kumar Swami, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 23, Bhawta Ki Dhani Behror, Police Station Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Arjun Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 15/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been ar- rested in connection with FIR No. 119/2025 registered at Police Station Patan, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 110, 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He fur- ther submits that complainant PW-1 and other material witnesses have turned hostile and not supported the prosecution story. Learned counsel further submits that the bail application of simi- larly placed co-accused Ajay Yadav, Sachin Kumar, Manisha and Kamlesh were allowed by this court and co-ordinate Bench of this court and the case of the present petitioner is akin to the case of [2026:RJ-JP:1588] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-515/2026] other co-accused who have been enlarged on bail. The accused- petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail appli- cation. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant have no objection if the petitioner is released on bail. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. In the light of the fact that the complainant and the other material witnesses have turned hostile and not supported the prosecution story, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, without express- ing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely: Neeraj Kumar Swami S/o Naresh Kumar Swami, in connec- tion with FIR No. 119/2025 registered at Police Station Patan, Dis- trict Sikar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a per- sonal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /18