Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14805 RFA No. 2480 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2480 OF 2025 (RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI V. ANANDA S/O. VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OFFICE AT NO.18, S-3, 2ND FLOOR 11TH CROSS, CUBBONPET NEAR BANAPPA PARK BENGALURU -560 002 …APPELLANT (BY SRI V. ANANDA, (PARTY-IN-PERSON)) AND:
SMT. SACHI AGARWAL W/O. ASHISH AGARWAL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OFFICE AT NO.18, 11TH CROSS CUBBONPET, NEAR BANAPPA PARK BENGALURU-560 002 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI SANTHOSH KUMAR G., ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.08.2025 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5774/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, C/C LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, (CCH-60) PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14805 RFA No. 2480 of 2025
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 12.03.2026 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. An application is filed seeking refund of the Court fee on the ground that the parties have settled the dispute outside the Court. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. M.C.Subramaniam - AIR 2021 SC 2662, the application is allowed and the office is directed to refund the entire Court fee in accordance with law.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
BKN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14