CHIKKANAPPA G. K. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY TAVAREKERE POLICE STATION
CRL.P/16593/2025 · 2026-03-05
M Nagaprasanna
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15305 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15305 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13935 CRL.P No. 16593 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16593 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
CHIKKANAPPA G.K., S/O. LATE. KALA BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
2.
MANJUNATHA C., S/O. CHIKKANAPPA G.K., AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
3. BYRAPPA S/O. LATE. BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
4. SARVAMANGALA W/O. CHIKKANAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT GANGAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, THIPPAGONDANAHALLI POST, TAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 577 213. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAMANA G., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13935 CRL.P No. 16593 of 2025
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY TAVAREKERE POLICE STATION MAGADI SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU SOUTH REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING COMPLEX, BENGALURU – 560 001.
2.
NARASIMHAMURTHY B.C., S/O LATE CHAYAPATHI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 133, BANASHANKARI 6TH STAGE, BDA LAYOUT, TALAGHATTAPURA, BENGALURU – 560 050. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPP FOR R-1;
SRI NATARAJU T., ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.528 OF BNSS PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.355/2025 OF TAVAREKERE POLICE STATION FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 189(2), 190, 329(3), 191(2), 324(5), 351(3) OF BNS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE(JR.DN) AND JMFC AT MAGADI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSIONA, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13935 CRL.P No. 16593 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo reads as follows:
“MEMO
The Counsel for the Respondent No.2 most respectfully submits as follows:
It is submitted that, in the above case the Petitioners have challenged the FIR in Crime No.355/2025 registered by the Respondent police. During the pendency of the above petition, the Respondent Police Completed the investigation and submitted the charge sheet before the jurisdictional Court in C.C.No.168/2026, by considering the same, the Trial Court was pleased to issue summons to the accused persons and the case is scheduled to be posted on 08.06.2026. In view of the filing of charge sheet in C.C.No.168/2026, the above petition does not survive for consideration. Hence this Memo it may kindly be taken on record, in the interest of justice.
In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as withdrawn.
I.A.No.1/2025 also stands disposed, as a consequence.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 41