Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15305 (JHR)

BINOD MIRDHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4691/2026 · 2026-05-29

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15841 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4691 of 2026 ---- Binod Mirdha, aged about 25 years, son of Jago Mirdha, resident of Village – Patharghatiya, P.O.-Dubrajpur, P.S.-Palojori, District – Deoghar (Jharkhand) …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prathik, Adv. For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 29th May, 2026 1. Heard Mr. Prathik, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP. 2. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.50 of 2026. 3. The petitioner and some other accused persons were apprehended by the police as they were suspected to be involved in cyber-crime. From the possession of the petitioner one mobile phone with SIM Card was recovered. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no victim has come forward to lodge any complaint against this petitioner and further the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 08.04.2026. 5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Regard being had to the aforesaid facts, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, cyber-crime, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.50 of 2026, subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioner. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated: 29th May, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 01.06.2026