1 2026:CGHC:2058 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3864 of 2022 1 - Annuram Baghel S/o Darasram Baghel Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Sakralipara, P.S. Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 2 - Samaru Ajay S/o Abheram Ajay Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Khurghati, Post Kavlajhar, P.S. Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 3 - Devlal Patle S/o Samaru Patle Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Sukhapali, P.S. Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Director Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Collector/district Mission Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 4 - District Project Coordinator District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 5 - Block Coordinator Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Ravi Kumar Banjare, Advocate For Res./State : Mr. Abhishek K. Singh, Panel Lawyer For Res. Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board 13/01/2026 1. This present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “10.1.This Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, writ or writs, order or orders to respondents for directing the respondents to make fresh representation before the competent authority for grant of alternative job equivalent to the instructor in the respective department, where the petitioners were being employed. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem-fit and appropriate.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the grievance projected in this writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to respondent Nos. 1 who may be directed to decide the same in accordance with law within a specific period of time. 3. Learned counsel for the State have no objection in this regard. 4. Mr. Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 submits that the grievances of the petitioner may be redressed by the State, respondent No. 1 herein. 5. In view of the above, without commenting on merits of the case,this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent Nos. 1 within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such representation being made, it is expected that respondent No. 1 would take a decision on it within a further 3 period of 120 days from the date of its receipt in accordance with law. 6. With this observation(s)/direction(s) this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput ) Judge Ami AMITA DUBEY Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2026.01.20 17:21:34 +0530