- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13610-DB CCC No. 814 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 814 OF 2024 BETWEEN: M/S. UNISHIRE PROMOTERS PVT., LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PRESENTLY AT NO.42, CASTLE STREET, ASHOK NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 025. REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SRI. PRATIK K MEHTA, …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. RAJESH A., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G.S. VENKAT SUBBA RAO., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NAVEENRAJ SINGH, S/O FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINT MAJOR, CHAIRMAN, KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, NO. 1/14, 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13610-DB CCC No. 814 of 2024 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMETN OF RERA HOUSING, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, ROOM NO. 213, 2ND FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. DEVAIAH I.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1, SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA, AGA FOR R2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO APPREHEND THE ACCUSED PERSON AND DEAL WITH THE ACCUSED PERSONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR HAVING COMMITTED DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU IN W.P.NO.14615/2024 DATED 07.06.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE - A AND OTHER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) The Contempt of Court case is filed alleging non compliance of order dated 07.06.2024 in W.P.No.14615/2024. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13610-DB CCC No. 814 of 2024 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 - accused as well as learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.2 submits that the said order has been subjected to a review and the order has been reviewed and the writ petition has been restored to file. A copy of the order of the learned Single Judge dated 28.03.2025 in the review petition is also made available. 3. In view of the above, we are of the opinion that nothing survives for consideration in the Contempt of Court case. Accordingly, it is closed. Notice, if any, issued shall stand discharged. All contentions of the parties on merits are left open. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE RR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 28