SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH v. RAM KRIPAL SINGH AND 2 OTHERS
A227/3418/2015 · 2026-10-07
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15301 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15301 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3418 of 2015 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This case is of the year 2015 and listed under the heading of 'infructuous cases'.
2. In the revised call, junior counsel has appeared on behalf of petitioner and requests for adjournment.
3. After going through the material on record, this Court finds that application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC was rejected, thereafter, misc. appeal was also rejected. Concurrent finding of fact has been recorded which needs no interference of this Court.
4. The petition stands dismissed. October 8, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhagwati Prasad Singh, Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : K.K. Mishra (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Shailendra Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Ram Kripal Singh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad