SANJAY @ SONU SURYAVANSHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
MCRC/302/2026 · 2026-01-11
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15300 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15300 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:1762
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 302 of 2026 Sanjay @ Sonu Suryavanshi S/o Kailash Singh Aged About 32 Years R/o Deepak Colony, P.S. Rajendra Nagar, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through – Station House Officer, Police Station- Devendra Nagar, Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.)
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant : Ms. Khushbu Sahu, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Nupoor Trivedi, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
Order on Board 12.01.2026
1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) in connection with Crime No.101/2025, registered at Police Station – Devendra Nagar, Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.) for the offences punishable under Section 20(B) and 22(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for short, the NDPS Act. 2. The prosecution case in short is that, on 19.05.2025, the police of police station Devendra Nagar received an information from informant and after complying with the mandatory provisions of NDPS Act, the RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN
2 police proceeded towards the place of incident Paras Nagar near over bridge P.S. Devendra Nagar Raipur and from possession of accused Sonu alias Sanjay Suryavanshi recovered a white cotton bag containing prohibited tablets "SPASMO PROXYVON" total 19 stripes each stripes have 8 capsules total 119 gram. On the basis of memorandum of accused Sonu alias Sanjay Suryavanshi, caught co- accused Vasudev Pandey alias Babu and recovered tablets "SPASMO PROXYVON" total 06 stripes each stripes have 48 capsules and police also recovered tablets "SPASMO PROXYVON PLUS" total 07 box in 5 box 144-144 number, 1 box 128 number, 1 box 88 number total 936 number capsules & "SPASMO PROXYVON ADVANCE" 6 box and out of which in 5 box containing 144-144 and in 1 box containing 96 capsules total 816 number of capsules total 1752 number capsules have been seized. The total weight of seized capsules is 1051.2 gram. Hence, this application. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case.
It is submitted that though the total quantity of contraband article seized is more than the commercial quantity, but from the possession of the present applicant, only 91.02 Gram of SPASMO PROXYVON PLUS has been recovered from the possession of the applicant which is less than the commercial quantity. The applicant is in jail since 19.05.2025. The conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. 4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the State opposes the bail
3 application and submits that a total of 1051.02 Grams of SPASMO PROXYVON PLUS has been seized in the present case, which is much above the commercial quantity, and the name of the applicant has come into light from the memorandum statement of the co- accused person, as such it appears to be an organized crime. The bail application of the co-accused has already been rejected by this Court vide order dated 25.08.2025 passed in MCRC No.6694/2025. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. Hence, this bail application is liable to be rejected. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6.
Taking into consideration the fact that the total quantity of contraband article seized in the present case i.e. 1051.02 Grams of SPASMO PROXYVON PLUS, which is much above the commercial quantity, and the name of the applicant has come into light from the memorandum statement of the co-accused person, as such it appears to be an organized crime and the applicant is failed to give any explanation for the same and it could not be a case of false implication, and the bail application of the co-accused has already been rejected by this Court vide order dated 25.08.2025 passed in MCRC No.6694/2025, the charge-sheet has been filed in this case, hence, the bail application of applicant – Sanjay @ Sonu Suryavanshi involved in Crime No.101/2025, registered at Police Station – Devendra Nagar, Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.) for the offences punishable under Section 20(B) and 22(C) of the NDPS Act, is rejected at this stage. 4
7. Needless to say that the learned trial Court concerned is at liberty to proceed with the trial and conclude the same, expeditiously. 8. The Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice
Rahul Dewangan