[2026:RJ-JP:14658] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4068/2026 Kayyum Pathan S/o Karim Pathan, Age 39 Years, R/o 169 Payga School Wali Gali Surajpole Kota Thana Kethunipole Kota City Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. S.K. Singh HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 08/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 1/2026 registered at Police Station Kaithunipol, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 3(5) BNS and under Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is behind the bars since 19.02.2026. He also submits that the name of the accused-petitioner is not in the FIR. He further submits that the injuries sustained by the injured Abdul Nayeem has been attributed to the co-accused Sharif. He further submits that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court itself. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and conclusion of trial [2026:RJ-JP:14658] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4068/2026] will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 19.02.2026; co-accused has already been enlarged on bail; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused petitioner and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Kayyum Pathan S/o Karim Pathan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. [2026:RJ-JP:14658] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4068/2026] 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /45