Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15299 (RAJ)

DHARMRAJ S/O SURAJKARAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/406/2026 · 2026-01-13

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1400] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 406/2026 Dharmraj S/o Surajkaran, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gurjaron Ka Mohalla, Chawandiya, Police Station Pachewar, District Tonk Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In District Jail Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swapnil Singh Patel for Mr. Laxmikant Sharma (Malpura) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 13/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.132/2025 registered at Police Station Pachewar, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the challan papers. 4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is of hitting the motorcycle of the injured-complainant resulting into certain injuries. [2026:RJ-JP:1400] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-406/2026] 5. On perusal of the injury report of the injured-Balram, it is revealed that he has sustained 5 injuries, out of which, 4 have been opined to be simple in nature and one of the injury at the wrist joint has been opined to be grievous in nature. None of the injuries have been opined to be dangerous to life. 6. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2025 and the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-sheet in the matter. 7. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case and more particularly the fact that none of the injury sustained by the complainant party has been opined to be dangerous to life, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 8. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /164