CRM-M-12237 IN T 223 RAHUL SING STATE OF HA CORAM:- HO Present:- M for Mr *** RUPINDERJIT 1. Th Bharatiya Naga seek anticipator Sections 120-B Khera, District B 2. On the in 12 Ba 12237-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR CR Da SINGH Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPIN Mr. Shiv Kumar Rana, Advocate fo for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Hary ***** ERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition file Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for cipatory bail in case FIR No.302 date B, 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 istrict Bhiwani. On 24.03.2026, the following order “Prayer in the present petit the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of ant in case FIR No.302 dated 01.09.2 120-B, 406, 420, 467, 468 and Bawani Khera, District Bhiwani. PUNJAB & HARYANA IGARH CRM-M-12237-2026 Date of decision: 06.04.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondent UPINDERJIT CHAHAL cate for , Haryana. n filed under Section 482 of the 3 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioners 2 dated 01.09.2023 registered under 471 IPC, at Police Station Bawani g order was passed by this Court: - petition filed under Section 482 of f anticipatory bail to the petitioner .09.2023 registered under Sections and 471 IPC, at Police Station oner dent f the ners nder wani of ner ons ion GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-12237 pet fur the con on acc the off of ad ben his com ha Co No cou wil by the ha sub ser the dis inv wh the ad sat 12237-2026 2 Learned counsel for the pet petitioner has been falsely implic further submitted that the petitione the alleged fraud, nor was named contended that the petitioner has b only on the basis of the disclosu accused Deepak Rathi. Apart fr there is no other evidence to co offence in question and it is a trite of the co-accused during his c admissible. He argued that the beneficiary to the alleged fraud a his account, nor he demanded complainant at any point of time. F has already been granted the conc Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, No recovery is to be effected counsel has further submitted tha willing to join the investigation as by the investigating agency. On the other hand, learned the status report in the matter and has opposed the prayer for gr submitting that the allegations leve serious in nature. However, he has the petitioner has been nominate disclosure statement of the co-accu Adjourned to 06.04.2026. In the meantime, the pe investigation within a week from to when required by the Investigatin the Investigating Agency. In the admitted to interim bail on furnish satisfaction of Arresting/Investig e petitioner has submitted that the plicated in the present case. He tioner has neither any concern with amed in the FIR. It has also been has been nominated as an accused losure statement made by the co- rt from the disclosure statement, o connect the petitioner with the trite law that disclosure statement is custodial interrogation is not the petitioner was neither any ud as no amount was deposited in ded any money or induced the me. Further, co-accused Anil Harit oncession of anticipatory bail by a urt, vide order dated 27.05.2024. ted from the petitioner. Learned that the petitioner is ready and n as and when called upon to do so ned State counsel has already filed and while referring to the same, he r grant of anticipatory bail, by levelled against the petitioner are e has not controverted the fact that nated as an accused only on the accused Deepak Rathi. petitioner is directed to join m today and would appear as and gating Officer and cooperate with the event of arrest, he shall be rnishing of bail/surety bonds to the estigating Officer. The petitioner the He ith een sed - nt, the ent not any in the arit y a 24. ned nd so led , he by are hat the oin nd ith be the ner GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-12237 sha 48 3. Lea the order dated investigation. 4. Lea Kumar, has sub longer required 5. In interim order d petitioner shall Investigating O Section 482(2) o 06.04.2026 Gurpreet 12237-2026 3 shall also abide by the condition 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.” Learned counsel for the petitioner dated 24.03.2026 passed by this Cour tion. Learned counsel for the State, on as submitted that the petitioner has joi quired for further investigation. In view of the statement made b rder dated 24.03.2026 passed by this shall continue to join investigation ting Officer and shall also abide by the 82(2) of the BNSS. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No itions as envisaged under Section tioner submits that in compliance of s Court, the petitioner has joined the te, on instructions from ASI Rakesh joined the investigation and is no ade by learned State counsel, the y this Court, is made absolute. The gation, as and when called by the by the conditions as provided under (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE es/No ion ce of d the kesh no , the The the nder AL) GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.