Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010205552026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2824/2026 AZAD ALI AND ANR. SO JAHAN UDDIN, RO VILL KHAMAR, PS BOGIRBARI, DIST KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM 2: SAHER ALI @ SAHAR ALI SO LATE MAKKAR ALI RO VILL TAMAKUBARI PS BOGIRBARI DIST KOKRAJHAR ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MD A RAHMAN, SAMIM RAHMAN,MR. SURAJIT DAS,MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ,A W AMAN,S T AMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 28.09.2026 Heard Mr. S. Nawaz learned Counsel for the petitioners and Ms. SH Bora, Page No.# 2/3 learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this application, the petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Bogribari PS Case No. 55/2026 registered under Sections112/ 3(5)/ 3(6)/ 3(8)/ 3(9)/ 308(1)/ 308(6)/ 308(7)/ 317(1)/ 317(4)/ 318(1)/ 318(4)/ 319(1)/ 319(2)/ 351(2)/ 351(3)/ 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioners were arrested and is put behind the bars on 05.09.2026 was lodged by the police personnel of Bogribari Police Station stating inter alia that petitioners along with another without any lawful authority and without any qualification had stationed themselves in and around the police station and are making a livelihood out of the public, who come there with some police work. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits there are no specific allegations against the accused persons and that the allegations made in the FIR are all vague in nature. 4. Ms. SH Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, on perusal of the Case Diary submits that few of the journalists had given statements that they had seen the petitioners along with others assembling in and around the Police Station and speaking to the persons who come to the Police Station for some work. She as such objects to the ground of the bail. 5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, more so, in view of the fact no specific allegations were made against the petitioners neither in the FIR nor in the statement of witnesses in the Case Diary, this Court enlarges the petitioners on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with one local surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Kokrajhar under the following conditions: i) the petitioners will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when Page No.# 3/3 called for. ii) the petitioners will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case. iii) the petitioners will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the permission of the concerned Court. 6. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant