M/S NAVMI INDUSTRIES TH VIHAL GUPTA v. UT OF J AND K AND ORS TH COMMISSIONER TO GOVT INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPTT AND ORS
WP(C)/1794/2026 · 2026-06-15
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1529 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1529 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1794/2026 CM No. 3966/2026
M/S Navmi Industries
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gourav Sadotra, Advocate
vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Dewakar Sharma, Dy.AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER (15.06.2026)
01. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, after some
arguments, has submitted that he would be satisfied if respondents are
directed to treat the present petition as a representation and accord
consideration thereto within a stipulated time frame. His statement is taken on record.
02. Having regard to the limited and innocuous prayer made by learned senior counsel, present petition is allowed and respondents are directed to treat the present writ petition as a representation and consider the same in accordance with law expeditiously, after completion of requisite formalities, within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order along with a copy of the petition and annexure is made available.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
Jammu 15.06.2026 Sapna Serial No. 53