Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1529 (JK)

M/S NAVMI INDUSTRIES TH VIHAL GUPTA v. UT OF J AND K AND ORS TH COMMISSIONER TO GOVT INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPTT AND ORS

WP(C)/1794/2026 · 2026-06-15

Rajesh Sekhri

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1794/2026 CM No. 3966/2026 M/S Navmi Industries …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gourav Sadotra, Advocate vs UT of J&K & Ors. .…Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Dewakar Sharma, Dy.AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER (15.06.2026) 01. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, after some arguments, has submitted that he would be satisfied if respondents are directed to treat the present petition as a representation and accord consideration thereto within a stipulated time frame. His statement is taken on record. 02. Having regard to the limited and innocuous prayer made by learned senior counsel, present petition is allowed and respondents are directed to treat the present writ petition as a representation and consider the same in accordance with law expeditiously, after completion of requisite formalities, within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order along with a copy of the petition and annexure is made available. (RAJESH SEKHRI) JUDGE Jammu 15.06.2026 Sapna Serial No. 53