$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010357982026 + W.P.(C) 11129/2026 & CM APPL. 51502/2026 SIDDHIVINAYAK SHIKSHAN PRASARK MANDAL’S R.K. B.ED. COLLEGE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat Sr. Adv Mr. Mayank Manish Adv Mr. Ravi Kant Adv Mr. Vineet Upadhyay Adv Mr. Jayant Dubey Adv versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 06.08.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- “(a) a Civil Writ of Mandamus for seeking direction to Respondent No.2 to issue Order of Restoration of Recognition to petitioner for its B. Ed. Course; and (b) a Civil Writ of Mandamus for seeking direction to Respondent No.2 to communicate the recognized status of Petitioner, to its Affiliating Body and the State Department of Higher Education, enabling the Petitioner, to participate in counselling & admission process for the present Academic This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/08/2026 at 11:34:03 Session 2026-27;...” 2. This order is being passed in view of a similar order dated 06.05.2026 passed in W.P.(C) 5036/2026, covering the present issue. Based upon the said order and using the same reasons and expressions, this order is being passed. 3. Mr. Sharawat, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted recognition by Western Regional Committee (“WRC”) on 29.01.2008 for conducting B.Ed. Course with an annual intake of 100 seats. He states that statutory appeal was preferred by the petitioner and the matter was remanded by the Appellate Committee to WRC to take further decision. 4. He submits that the only grievance of the petitioner is that while the matter was remanded by the Appellate Committee the impugned withdrawal order was quashed and set aside and till date the WRC has not issued the restoration order. 5. For the said reasons, issue notice. 6. Mr. Kapoor, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and on instructions, affirms the aforesaid factual position. 7. The WRC is directed to issue an order of restoration of recognition within a period of 2 days from today, which will govern the rights and contentions of the parties, unless fresh withdrawal order is passed by the WRC. 8. The petitioner will be permitted to participate in the counselling and admit students from the academic session 2026 -27 onwards, till the time a fresh withdrawal order is passed against it. 9. The status of petitioner as a recognized institution will also be reflected on the official website of respondents/NCTE and will be communicated by This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/08/2026 at 11:34:03 the NCTE to petitioner’s affiliating body as well as to the concerned department of the State Government forthwith. 10. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. JASMEET SINGH, J AUGUST 6, 2026/ (MS) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/08/2026 at 11:34:03