Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14014 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present petition is filed with the following prayer:-
"a. To issue any order or direction for expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 512 of 2020 (Vinay Kumar Singh v. Gangadhar Yadav) filed by the petitioner which is pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Vth) Varanasi, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, expeditiously within a fixed time frame."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings before the court concerned be directed to be concluded in a time bound manner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is complainant.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Vth), Varanasi to decide the Complaint Case No. 512 of 2020 (Vinay Kumar Singh v. Gangadhar Yadav) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. October 6, 2026 D. Tamang Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambrish Singh, Swapnil Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Vinay Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Gangadhar Yadav And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad