Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15281 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/38678/2026 · 2026-10-05

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38678 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Arnav Rai, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Rajesh Pratap Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ajeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA. 2. The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 06.04.2012 alongwith cognizance order dated 06.10.2012 as well as entire proceedings of Case Crime No.1121 of 2010, under Section 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Deogaon, District Azamgarh, pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.10, Azamgarh. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant submitted that earlier Application U/S 528 BNSS No.17040 of 2026 preferred at the behest of applicant challenging non-bailable warrant dated 08.04.2022 issued against applicant in the present case, was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 04.05.2026 by way of giving liberty to applicant to appear before learned court concerned within 15 days, but due to some unavoidable circumstances, applicant could not appear before learned court concerned. Learned counsel for applicant confined his prayer only to the extent that further time may be given to applicant to appear before learned court concerned in pursuance of order dated 04.05.2026 passed by this Court on the earlier petition to which learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has no objection. 4. In view thereof, three weeks further time is hereby extended in favour of applicant to appear before learned court concerned in pursuance of NBW order dated 08.04.2022. All the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of. October 6, 2026 Vivek Kr. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arnav Rai, Hemant Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajeet Kumar Singh, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, G.A. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Om Prakash Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad